-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/12/2005 13:07, Hauge Odd Arne uttered:

I always get 2 e-mail messages if a box does not repy to ping and two messages if it's declared down/up from alertenigne@nav... If a service is down/up I get 6 e-mail messages from alertengine... I have tried deleting my entire alertprofile and adding a new one, but it didn't make any different.

Did the alerts stop entirely when you disabled/deleted your profile? Could be that you've defined the same alert address on two different user accounts (or it might just be a weird bug). - -- Morten Vold, ITEA, NTNU A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDn+N6XxIl0kpcOkQRAgTWAJ0VpuQ9d2mvRrooBW/2tMcqc00LDwCgy35G nyc+3jSo0YjIMpjJVKul19s= =6yhB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From morten.vold at ntnu.no Wed Dec 14 10:25:58 2005 From: morten.vold at ntnu.no (Morten Vold) Date: Wed Dec 14 10:26:00 2005 Subject: VS: [Nav-users] Don't get alerts based on Sub category In-Reply-To: <s3959dc4.001@HVO-3.hivolda.no> References: <s3959dc4.001@HVO-3.hivolda.no> Message-ID: <439FE526.1010607@ntnu.no>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/12/2005 14:18, Peder Magne Sefland uttered:

I have been trying to get alerts based on this idea, but with no success. If I add "All alerts" I get alerts on email and sms. So I know that the alertengine is working.

But I have also tried to make an alert based on one ip-address (equals IP) with no success. When should I use "equals" or "in"? (I have tried both)

I cannot confirm nor deny your claims here. Fact is that I've experienced some very strange problems with the alert system myself. My problem is that I've tried creating an alert profile to alert me of anything that concerns one particular IP (or sysname), and it seems I always end up receiving any and all alerts that pass through NAV. Strangely enough, I don't hear anyone else here at NTNU complaining :-/ I asked the alertprofiles/alertengine authors to investigate a while back, but still no word from them. - -- Morten Vold, ITEA, NTNU A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDn+UmXxIl0kpcOkQRAhgBAKDpCHY9JCLThTCZ6Xz7DKM6vqfVBwCcCQSG EJtSJ20Ae9CaoxO6n1yZWiw= =ShBq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From morten.vold at ntnu.no Wed Dec 14 11:07:54 2005 From: morten.vold at ntnu.no (Morten Vold) Date: Wed Dec 14 11:07:57 2005 Subject: [Nav-users] missing FROM-clause entry for table netboxcategory In-Reply-To: <CARMENKicUbvBDxroC600000068@carmen.akton.si> References: <CARMENKicUbvBDxroC600000068@carmen.akton.si> Message-ID: <439FEEFA.2000002@ntnu.no>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2005 14:32, Perica Veljanovski uttered:

ProgrammingError: ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table "netboxcategory" [...] The same error appears when I try to edit ip devices. I did a select * query to manage.netbox and my device is there! Netboxcategory is empty, so I gather that the problem lies there but don't know what should be in it? Is this because I missed a step or maybe because I started to seed with a new device type.

Looks like a bug in editdb. I tried to grok the code quickly (it's not pretty ;) ), and my first impression is that your analysis is correct; that "Add IP Device" might crash if there are no registered netbox categories. Netbox categories are just a way to do site-specific categorization of devices. Example categories from our own installation are "Web", "Unix", "Windows", "LDAP" and soforth (we use them to categorize servers). I'll try to give the bug a closer look, but did you solve this problem on your installation?

Also I've read the mailing lists archive and see that you've reported a "unexpected EOF on client connection" error from postgresql, which I also have! I didn't find a reference on how to confront this problem though? I haven't got to that point yet, but it would be nice to have some input.

Sorry, but you'll have to live with this "problem" a bit longer. This error is logged by PostgreSQL because of some clients that don't properly close their database connections, they just sever them. Apparently some of the NAV processes don't behave properly in this respect. It's on the TODO-list to investigate which of them are the naughty ones, but rest assured that the only actual problem in this is that your PostgreSQL logs grow larger.

Note: my /alertprofiles/ doesn't work at all :) when I click it from /toolbox/ I get a blank screen.

Sounds like a PHP problem, but it looks like your fellow FreeBSD users are helping you with this :) - -- Morten Vold, ITEA, NTNU A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDn+76XxIl0kpcOkQRAlZNAKCebhr/8+FHW2mLdDQMCQm1Y+FuzACgx5S+ HOVwxf+mE28hzVqR3Rr1XcY= =LUC1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From Ingeborg.Hellemo at cc.uit.no Wed Dec 14 13:32:14 2005 From: Ingeborg.Hellemo at cc.uit.no (Ingeborg Hellemo) Date: Wed Dec 14 13:32:19 2005 Subject: SV: Re: [Nav-users] Don't get alerts based on Sub category In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:20:19 +0100." <s3970bc9.024@HVO-3.hivolda.no> Message-ID: <200512141232.jBECWEVD051728@dis.cc.uit.no>

peder.sefland@hivolda.no said:

Do mean that alerts based on Sub category works with your own filters/filter? I did not get it to work at, all based on Sub category

I have now tested this once more, and you are correct. Filters (global or personal) based on Sub category does not work. I really hope someone can fix this because we need this functionality. --Ingeborg