Forsvunnet dokumentasjon for NAV 2.1.5 (fwd)
Pr?ver en gang til, med godkjent avsender denne gangen... <reierr> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:08:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Reier Johan R?dland <reierr@usit.uio.no> To: nav-users@itea.ntnu.no Subject: Forsvunnet dokumentasjon for NAV 2.1.5 Tidliger kom vi til en side med lenker over diverse NAV-dokumentasjon p? http://metanav.ntnu.no/moin.cgi/NAVlinks/ (lenket under overskriften "Om NAV / Andre NAV") N? kommer en til en side som det ser ut til at er under konfigurasjon... Et eller anet med wikis?? Siden vi fremdeles kj?rer 2.1.5, s? hadde det v?rt fin om pekere virket. mvh <reierr>
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Reier Johan R?dland wrote:
Pr?ver en gang til, med godkjent avsender denne gangen...
<reierr>
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:08:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Reier Johan R?dland <reierr@usit.uio.no> To: nav-users@itea.ntnu.no Subject: Forsvunnet dokumentasjon for NAV 2.1.5
Tidliger kom vi til en side med lenker over diverse NAV-dokumentasjon p? http://metanav.ntnu.no/moin.cgi/NAVlinks/ (lenket under overskriften "Om NAV / Andre NAV") N? kommer en til en side som det ser ut til at er under konfigurasjon... Et eller anet med wikis??
Siden vi fremdeles kj?rer 2.1.5, s? hadde det v?rt fin om pekere virket.
mvh <reierr>
Linken er egentlig "http://metanav.ntnu.no/NAVlinks", men dette blir linket vidre til "http://metanav.ntnu.no/moin.cgi/NAVlinks" <reierr>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2005 10:11, Reier Johan R?dland uttered:
Tidliger kom vi til en side med lenker over diverse NAV-dokumentasjon p? http://metanav.ntnu.no/moin.cgi/NAVlinks/ (lenket under overskriften "Om NAV / Andre NAV")
I think you'll find what you're looking for at http://metanav.ntnu.no/oldindex.html .
N? kommer en til en side som det ser ut til at er under konfigurasjon... Et eller anet med wikis??
Since the URL http://metanav.ntnu.no/NAVlinks/ doesn't exist, you were redirected to the Wiki page for NAVLinks. No one has created a page by that name yet, so the page you saw gives you the option to create the NAVLinks wiki page. - -- Morten Vold NTNU ITEA Integrasjonsgruppen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCeeDXXxIl0kpcOkQRArOzAKDFD+ut0xlV4h2A0IE1NZRl+cw7GgCgpqlX uyz3qBBIouiOi67LZM6fToU= =5kRC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From morten.vold at ntnu.no Thu May 5 12:12:12 2005 From: morten.vold at ntnu.no (Morten Vold) Date: Thu May 5 11:12:19 2005 Subject: [Nav-users] NAV problems In-Reply-To: <E04174B5A513E542AD2CB6C1E18D9C7D4DD46F@Exchange.admin.khio.no> References: <E04174B5A513E542AD2CB6C1E18D9C7D4DD46F@Exchange.admin.khio.no> Message-ID: <4279E36C.7040801@ntnu.no>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 27/04/2005 14:20, Bulent Sarinc uttered:
ImportError: No module named psycopg
Did you install the psycopg Python module? What OS/Distribution are you running on?
Starting smsd.pl: Bareword "PGRES_CONNECTION_OK" not allowed while "strict subs" in use at /usr/local/nav/lib/perl/NAV.pm line 79.
Interesting, I've never seen perl complain about that one before. What version of perl are you running (perl -v)? Maybe our version doesn't enable strict subs just by "use strict" alone. Anyways, I guess there are two ways about this particular problem: 1. Either change all references to the PGRES_* constants from PGRES_* to &PGRES_* or \&PGRES_* (at least in NAV.pm and/or smsd.pl). 2. Or just remove "use strict" from those files for the time being. I'll probably attempt patch NAV using the first solution (because we _do_ want to "use strict") - you pick whatever you like to get your current installation working :-)
ImportError: No module named rrdtool
Did you install the rrdtool Python libraries? - -- Morten Vold NTNU ITEA Integrasjonsgruppen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCeeNsXxIl0kpcOkQRAhJcAJ9rfTDgxWqQCW6foP9hKjPEAokqDgCePxze O5O5/tnfFJzxMKJtuAIUoV4= =7C9R -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From odd.hauge at hiMolde.no Mon May 9 17:28:36 2005 From: odd.hauge at hiMolde.no (Hauge Odd Arne) Date: Mon May 9 16:28:43 2005 Subject: [Nav-users] No vlan detected for Catalyst 4000 switches running CatOS Message-ID: <8EEE7738AEDF6947B3E5508A0244D1C21B8ABB@stam.himolde.no>
Hi. getDeviceData do not detect vlan for my Cat4000 switches running CatOS version 8.4.1. getDeviceData.log says: May 09 12:17:34 2005 molde-telerom5-sw2.hiMolde.no_13 SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT New swport, swportid=1242028, moduleid=92105, port=34, ifindex=42, link=y, speed=100, duplex=f, media=null, trunk=f, portname=p11/21-Rom264.3 But for other Catalyst switches running IOS getDeviceData.log says: May 09 15:56:05 2005 sfrn-rimo-sw.hiMolde.no_11 SwportHandler-6-UPDATE_SWPORT Old: 13, Port: 12 Interface: FastEthernet0/12 Link: n Speed: 100 Duplex: h Media: null Vlan: 210 Trunk: false Portname: 112A/5874, New: 13, Port: 12 Interface: FastEthernet0/12 Link: n Speed: 100 Duulex: f Media: null Vlan: 210 Trunk: false Portname: 112A/5874 For the Catalyst 4000 switches if can not find any SwportHandler-6-UPDATE_SWPORT entrys in getdeviceData.log, only SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT. Some output from getDeviceData.log for a specific port 34: May 09 12:17:34 2005 molde-telerom5-sw2.hiMolde.no_13 SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT New swport, swportid=1242028, moduleid=92105, port=34, ifindex=42, link=y, speed=100, duplex=f, media=null, trunk=f, portname=p11/21-Rom264.3 May 09 12:17:35 2005 molde-telerom5-sw2.hiMolde.no_13 SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT New swport, swportid=1242077, moduleid=92102, port=34, ifindex=90, link=n, speed=1000, duplex=f, media=null, trunk=f, portname=null May 09 13:17:34 2005 molde-telerom5-sw2.hiMolde.no_14 SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT New swport, swportid=1242592, moduleid=92147, port=34, ifindex=42, link=y, speed=100, duplex=f, media=null, trunk=f, portname=p11/21-Rom264.3 May 09 13:17:35 2005 molde-telerom5-sw2.hiMolde.no_14 SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT New swport, swportid=1242641, moduleid=92144, port=34, ifindex=90, link=n, speed=1000, duplex=f, media=null, trunk=f, portname=null May 09 14:17:34 2005 molde-telerom5-sw2.hiMolde.no_05 SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT New swport, swportid=1243156, moduleid=92189, port=34, ifindex=42, link=y, speed=100, duplex=f, media=null, trunk=f, portname=p11/21-Rom264.3 May 09 14:17:34 2005 molde-telerom5-sw2.hiMolde.no_05 SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT New swport, swportid=1243205, moduleid=92186, port=34, ifindex=90, link=n, speed=1000, duplex=f, media=null, trunk=f, portname=null May 09 15:17:34 2005 molde-telerom5-sw2.hiMolde.no_03 SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT New swport, swportid=1243720, moduleid=92231, port=34, ifindex=42, link=y, speed=100, duplex=f, media=null, trunk=f, portname=p11/21-Rom264.3 May 09 15:17:34 2005 molde-telerom5-sw2.hiMolde.no_03 SwportHandler-6-NEW_SWPORT New swport, swportid=1243769, moduleid=92228, port=34, ifindex=90, link=n, speed=1000, duplex=f, media=null, trunk=f, portname=null As you can see the swportid and mouleid has changed for every log entry. What ca be the problem ? Regards Odd Arne Hauge
participants (2)
-
morten.vold@ntnu.no -
reier.rodland@usit.uio.no