The DNS data is correct for both servers so that is not the problem here.
- Roger
Peder Magne Sefland wrote:
Maybe some information is collected from dns and the other is from machine name?
Are they the same?
Peder
Roger Aas roger.aas@hsh.no 29.09.2005 11:20:53 >>>
I get this email from Alertengine:
X-Auth-No: Return-Path: navcron@nav3.hsh.no Received: from sentinel.hsh.no not authenticated [158.37.208.20] by posthus.hsh.no with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.22.1.16
$ on Novell NetWare;
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:41:26 +0200 Received: from artifact.hsh.no ([158.37.35.10]) by sentinel.hsh.no (SMSSMTP 4.1.7.33) with SMTP id
M2005092910483300240
for roger@posthus.hsh.no; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:48:33 +0200 Received: from sentinel.hsh.no (sentinel.hsh.no [158.37.208.20]) by artifact.hsh.no (8.9.3 (PHNE_28760)/8.9.3) with SMTP id
KAA07954
for roger.aas@hsh.no; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:48:33 +0200
(METDST)
Received: from nav3.hsh.no ([158.37.208.25]) by sentinel.hsh.no (SMSSMTP 4.1.7.33) with SMTP id
M2005092910483200238
for roger.aas@hsh.no; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:48:32 +0200 Received: from nav3.hsh.no (nav3.hsh.no [127.0.0.1]) by nav3.hsh.no (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8T8mWdi008206 for roger.aas@hsh.no; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:48:32 +0200 Received: (from navcron@localhost) by nav3.hsh.no (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j8T8mWdW008203; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:48:32 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:48:32 +0200 Message-Id: 200509290848.j8T8mWdW008203@nav3.hsh.no From: alertengine@nav.hsh.no To: roger.aas@hsh.no Subject: Box haugesund-auditoriume-ap.hsh.no is up
This is an automatically generated message from NAV:
Box haugesund-auditoriume-ap.hsh.no (158.37.35.132) is up since
2005-09-29 10:48:09.
As you can see it is only the "From:" header line that says "nav.hsh.no", the rest of the headers give the correct name for the server "nav3.hsh.no". Anyone know where this is happening? Some config I have missed? Or a small bug lurking somewhere? Or is it just a cosmetic thing since you are not supposed to answer such an email? Since I have called the NAV 2.1.5 server for nav.hsh.no it gave me a small moment of confusion... :-)
- Roger