Nav-users December 2022

nav-users@lister.sikt.no

5 participants
5 discussions

Business 350-8T-E-2G support in NAV versione 5.4.0
by Davide Miccone 21 Mar '23

21 Mar '23

Seems that NAV (versione 5.4.0) does not full support switch Cisco Business 350-8T-E-2G. I get some box infos but - for example - port VLANs are not correctly get. LLDP data and neighbors are not correctly get. Someone use switch Cisco Business 350-8T-E-2G? Davide

2 10

deviceNotice/None - no message template is defined
by Ingeborg Hellemo 08 Mar '23

08 Mar '23

NAV 5.5.2 An upgrade of a router generated several "Device SomeModule at router.domain had a software upgrade" (as expected), but also several Subject: deviceNotice/None on router.domain from NAV, but no message template is defined. Variable dump: {'_messages': None, 'alert_type': None, 'device': <Device: VB13030631>, 'event': <EventQueue: id=101132957, event_type_id='deviceNotice', source_id='ipdevpoll', target_id='eventEngine', netbox=<Netbox: router.domain> , subid='', state='x', time=datetime.datetime(2022, 12, 13, 13, 50, 53, 897695)>, 'event_type': <EventType: deviceNotice>, 'history_vars': {}, 'language': 'en', 'msgtype': 'email', 'netbox': <Netbox: router.domain>, 'severity': 3, 'source': <Subsystem: ipdevpoll>, 'state': 'x', 'subid': '', 'time': datetime.datetime(2022, 12, 13, 13, 50, 53, 897695), 'value': 100} --Ingeborg -- Ingeborg Østrem Hellemo -- ingeborg.hellemo(a)uit.no Dep. of Information Technology --- Univ. of Tromsø

2 6

Fortigate firewall
by Biselx Nicolas 02 Jan '23

02 Jan '23

Hi, We have a Fortigate firewall that I introduced with the GW category (routers layer 3 device), all information seems ok according to the capture. But when I look at the tools > watchdog there is a problem with the routing interfaces not being recognized ? It's a same with GSW Is there a solution to fix this? Regards, Nicolas

2 3

Correcting NAV topology after a physical reconfiguration
by tom.daae＠lom.kommune.no 21 Dec '22

21 Dec '22

Hi, I'm a new user of NAV and have found it to be a very useful tool. Among other things, it has helped us discover and plan improvements to our network topology. After implementing said improvements however, I find myself in a bit of a predicament. Two of my switches were previously connected via a link (in practice a daisy-chain), which is no longer physically present. NAV, of course, does not know the difference between a link that is temporarily down and one that is never coming back up, so the link remains in our netmap. I have not found a way of removing this link from NAV, short of deleting and re-registering the switches on either end of the link. This would of course mean losing a lot of traffic stats, so I'm wondering if there is any way to tell NAV do forget this specific link? Am I just misunderstanding something fundamental here?

2 1

Fortigate firewall
by Biselx Nicolas 20 Dec '22

20 Dec '22

1 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Nav-users December 2022