Hi !
We are interested in request for both the short and long term.
I guess that NAV santa is a bit late or maybe too early ? :-)
I would like to see a system for collecting switch/router/wirelss configuration automaticly and maybe get a diff status each night to see change in configuration.
-- Med vennlig hilsen / Regards;
Roar Pettersen Universitetet i Bergen - The University of Bergen Nygardsgt. 5 - N-5020 BERGEN - Norway Tlf: +47 55 58 40 55 VIP: 81503 fax: +47 55 58 40 70 roar.pettersen@it.uib.no - IT-Avd, UiB - http://www.uib.no
From odd.hauge at hiMolde.no Wed Jan 4 16:21:47 2006
From: odd.hauge at hiMolde.no (Hauge Odd Arne) Date: Wed Jan 4 16:21:56 2006 Subject: [Nav-users] Feature requests anyone? Message-ID: 8EEE7738AEDF6947B3E5508A0244D1C27D128B@stam.himolde.no
New features: SNMP traps and SNMP Threshold are already mentioned. Better integration of Arnold into Nav, Sorted port statistics, top talkers, ... A better working syslog analyzer, Better support for wireless equipment, trace of wireless users, Automatically download of configs from network equipment A vmware version of Nav, like Peder suggested Navprofiles mut be easier to understand. No problem to get lost while customizing profiles...
- odd arne
-----Original Message----- From: nav-users-bounces@itea.ntnu.no [mailto:nav-users-bounces@itea.ntnu.no] On Behalf Of Vidar Faltinsen Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:02 PM To: nav-users@itea.ntnu.no Subject: [Nav-users] Feature requests anyone?
Hi,
As I mentioned in a previous posting NTNU and UNINETT are currently planning the 2006 NAV activity. We are more ambitious this year and are prepared to put a lot of resources into maintaining and further developing NAV.
We are currently working on a list of new features to implement. I could present the list, but at this stage I will rather ask the NAV community... what do you want?
We certainly have some ideas ourselves, partly based on feedback, both on- and offline. Nevertheless, please empty your (navish) heart and express your wishes! This is your chance (well, one of them).
We are interested in request for both the short and long term.
I assume more smooth installation, maybe support for certain equipment types, etc, is on the list. Further - in terms of new and/or improved functionality - what would you like?
As NAV is an open source project, contributions are very much welcome. If you have plans or hopes in this respect, please let us know.
All input is of value. This includes criticism. Looking forward to this thread!
- Vidar
Nav-users mailing list Nav-users@itea.ntnu.no http://mailman.itea.ntnu.no/mailman/listinfo/nav-users