On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:20:51 +0000 Rene Romijn r.romijn@deli-ict.nl wrote:
Follow the BRIDGE-MIB lead and tell us what you find.
The snmpwalk gives me the following output:
snmpwalk -v2c -c public 172.17.205.17 .1.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.1 = INTEGER: 257 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.2 = INTEGER: 258 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.3 = INTEGER: 259 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.4 = INTEGER: 260 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.5 = INTEGER: 261 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.6 = INTEGER: 262 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.7 = INTEGER: 263 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.8 = INTEGER: 264 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.9 = INTEGER: 265 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.10 = INTEGER: 266 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.11 = INTEGER: 267 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.12 = INTEGER: 268 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.13 = INTEGER: 269 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.14 = INTEGER: 270 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.15 = INTEGER: 271 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.16 = INTEGER: 272 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.17 = INTEGER: 273 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.18 = INTEGER: 274 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.19 = INTEGER: 275 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.20 = INTEGER: 276 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.21 = INTEGER: 277 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.22 = INTEGER: 278 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.23 = INTEGER: 279 iso.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4.1.2.24 = INTEGER: 280
Then the interfaces with ifindexes from 257 through 280 should be recognized as switch ports by NAV (the ifindex numbers should be available in the interfaces report from before).
If this isn't the case, you should check to see if ipdevpoll.log contains any errors related to this switch (and when viewing the ipdevinfo page for the switch, what does it say is the "last updated" time?).