Thank you for the reply. Currently due to some problem I have to reconfigure the nav server from the beginning. Last time I had done it from source on Centos 7 but I am configuring the new one from the debian installation, once the installation is completed I shall let you know about the problem.
Once again thank you so much for the support.
With regards, Sauraj Thapa Vianet Communication Pvt Ltd Phone: +977-980-10-46410 +977-1 4217555 http://www.vianet.com.np
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
-----Original Message----- From: Morten Brekkevold [mailto:morten.brekkevold@uninett.no] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 6:05 PM To: Sauraj Cc: nav-users@uninett.no Subject: Re: FW: Topology Problem
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:17:05 +0545 Sauraj sauraj@vianet.com.np wrote:
Actually the ips in screen shot (172.30.24.15,172.30.24.13 and 192.168.112.82 ) are layer two network in our network topology but it is not displayed in the geomap.
Layer 3 network seems to be fine but the l2 network is not displayed in geomap.
First off, you should really give your switches more memorable names by registering them in your DNS server.
Second of all, what switch models and vendors are you using? Empty interface names from 192.168.112.82 and 87 seem suspect. What do their switchport report listings look like?
-- Morten Brekkevold UNINETT