-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/12/2005 13:07, Hauge Odd Arne uttered:
I always get 2 e-mail messages if a box does not repy to ping and two
messages if it's declared down/up from alertenigne@nav... If a service
is down/up I get 6 e-mail messages from alertengine...
I have tried deleting my entire alertprofile and adding a new one, but
it didn't make any different.
Did the alerts stop entirely when you disabled/deleted your profile?
Could be that you've defined the same alert address on two different
user accounts (or it might just be a weird bug).
- --
Morten Vold, ITEA, NTNU
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDn+N6XxIl0kpcOkQRAgTWAJ0VpuQ9d2mvRrooBW/2tMcqc00LDwCgy35G
nyc+3jSo0YjIMpjJVKul19s=
=6yhB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>From morten.vold at ntnu.no Wed Dec 14 10:25:58 2005
From: morten.vold at ntnu.no (Morten Vold)
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:26:00 2005
Subject: VS: [Nav-users] Don't get alerts based on Sub category
In-Reply-To:
s3959dc4.001@HVO-3.hivolda.no
References:
s3959dc4.001@HVO-3.hivolda.no
Message-ID:
439FE526.1010607@ntnu.no
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/12/2005 14:18, Peder Magne Sefland uttered:
> I have been trying to get alerts based on this idea, but with no
> success. If I add "All alerts" I get alerts on email and sms. So I
> know that the alertengine is working.
>
> But I have also tried to make an alert based on one ip-address
> (equals IP) with no success. When should I use "equals" or "in"? (I
> have tried both)
I cannot confirm nor deny your claims here. Fact is that I've
experienced some very strange problems with the alert system myself. My
problem is that I've tried creating an alert profile to alert me of
anything that concerns one particular IP (or sysname), and it seems I
always end up receiving any and all alerts that pass through NAV.
Strangely enough, I don't hear anyone else here at NTNU complaining :-/
I asked the alertprofiles/alertengine authors to investigate a while
back, but still no word from them.
- --
Morten Vold, ITEA, NTNU
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDn+UmXxIl0kpcOkQRAhgBAKDpCHY9JCLThTCZ6Xz7DKM6vqfVBwCcCQSG
EJtSJ20Ae9CaoxO6n1yZWiw=
=ShBq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>From morten.vold at ntnu.no Wed Dec 14 11:07:54 2005
From: morten.vold at ntnu.no (Morten Vold)
Date: Wed Dec 14 11:07:57 2005
Subject: [Nav-users] missing FROM-clause entry for table netboxcategory
In-Reply-To:
CARMENKicUbvBDxroC600000068@carmen.akton.si
References:
CARMENKicUbvBDxroC600000068@carmen.akton.si
Message-ID:
439FEEFA.2000002@ntnu.no
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2005 14:32, Perica Veljanovski uttered:
> ProgrammingError: ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table
> "netboxcategory"
[...]
> The same error appears when I try to edit ip devices. I did a select
> * query to manage.netbox and my device is there! Netboxcategory is
> empty, so I gather that the problem lies there but don't know what
> should be in it? Is this because I missed a step or maybe because I
> started to seed with a new device type.
Looks like a bug in editdb. I tried to grok the code quickly (it's not
pretty ;) ), and my first impression is that your analysis is correct;
that "Add IP Device" might crash if there are no registered netbox
categories.
Netbox categories are just a way to do site-specific categorization of
devices. Example categories from our own installation are "Web",
"Unix", "Windows", "LDAP" and soforth (we use them to categorize servers).
I'll try to give the bug a closer look, but did you solve this problem
on your installation?
> Also I've read the mailing lists archive and see that you've reported
> a "unexpected EOF on client connection" error from postgresql, which
> I also have! I didn't find a reference on how to confront this
> problem though? I haven't got to that point yet, but it would be nice
> to have some input.
Sorry, but you'll have to live with this "problem" a bit longer. This
error is logged by PostgreSQL because of some clients that don't
properly close their database connections, they just sever them.
Apparently some of the NAV processes don't behave properly in this
respect. It's on the TODO-list to investigate which of them are the
naughty ones, but rest assured that the only actual problem in this is
that your PostgreSQL logs grow larger.
> Note: my /alertprofiles/ doesn't work at all :) when I click it from
> /toolbox/ I get a blank screen.
Sounds like a PHP problem, but it looks like your fellow FreeBSD users
are helping you with this :)
- --
Morten Vold, ITEA, NTNU
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDn+76XxIl0kpcOkQRAlZNAKCebhr/8+FHW2mLdDQMCQm1Y+FuzACgx5S+
HOVwxf+mE28hzVqR3Rr1XcY=
=LUC1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From Ingeborg.Hellemo at cc.uit.no Wed Dec 14 13:32:14 2005
From: Ingeborg.Hellemo at cc.uit.no (Ingeborg Hellemo)
Date: Wed Dec 14 13:32:19 2005
Subject: SV: Re: [Nav-users] Don't get alerts based on Sub category
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:20:19 +0100."
s3970bc9.024@HVO-3.hivolda.no
Message-ID: 200512141232.jBECWEVD051728@dis.cc.uit.no
peder.sefland@hivolda.no said:
Do mean that alerts based on Sub category works with your own filters/filter?
I did not get it to work at, all based on Sub category
I have now tested this once more, and you are correct. Filters (global or
personal) based on Sub category does not work. I really hope someone can fix
this because we need this functionality.
--Ingeborg