Hi,
for me NAV is very good piece of work :) I have plans to use it in my company,
but I have some questions.
1. How serious You are about hunting bugs and making new releases?
I know, that Morten Werner Olsen and some guys are porting NAV do Debian
(I'm using this packet), the feedback is very good so far :)
2. What about cricket bug in Debian - no descriptons in stats for routers
interfaces?
3. Vlans... I know, that there is problem with cisco, and info about vlans. Is
there a chance that it will be solved? I will try change my interface
descripions according to guide lines from nav web, but this is some
inconvenience.
4. New release? When? I want to make clean Debian install of NAV, but would be
nice if I could make this on some new version.
Thanks for developing NAV,
best regards
--
Wojciech (Woj) Kozicki
>From morten.vold at ntnu.no Wed Jan 19 11:25:00 2005
From: morten.vold at ntnu.no (Morten Vold)
Date: Wed Jan 19 11:25:03 2005
Subject: SV: [Nav-users] Cheetah compile errors in
deviceManagementTemplate.tmpl
In-Reply-To:
41EE19A6.1070305@ntnu.no
References:
B1272BF7DAE6094E8D302FF90A391808DFBD8C@DIGITALIS.hitos.no
41EE19A6.1070305@ntnu.no
Message-ID:
41EE357C.4030503@ntnu.no
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Morten Vold wrote:
> I will have to investigate further, possibly installing an updated
> Cheetah to track down all the errors.
So I did. I have checked in r3104 in Subversion, which should fix
syntax errors in all the templates that Cheetah 0.9.16 would complain about.
- --
Morten Vold
NTNU ITEA Integrasjonsgruppen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB7jV8XxIl0kpcOkQRApXaAKCNrp4B5Pa1dbCYyvgXCeKDiPF93ACfYFqd
cy05Au8p6uEhjUPCukusQew=
=JTo6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>From kreide at online.no Wed Jan 19 13:53:06 2005
From: kreide at online.no (Kristian Eide)
Date: Wed Jan 19 13:53:22 2005
Subject: [Nav-users] no VLAN information in NAV
Message-ID:
41EF455E@epostleser.online.no
>> We try to find VLAN numbers on a best-effort basis, and for most devices
>and what about switches - should I put some descriptons there too?
This should normally not be necessary; NAV will be able to do this
automatically.
--
Kristian