7 Apr
2006
7 Apr
'06
18:06
Good day! I've read guidelines for interfaces descriptions at http://metanav.ntnu.no/moin.cgi/SubnetsAndVlans , but still have some questions:
1) Does this URL is up to date (I'm using 3401 revision of NAV)? 2) Which way should I configure descriptions for switchports and router interfaces without ip addresses (trunk interfaces)? 3) Does NAV tracks interface description changes, or only when deleting/adding IP device to database?
Thank you in advance.
--
With best regards,
Alexander Krapivin mailto:kaa@msu.net
NOC MSUNET ICQ UIN:3967345
MSU, Moscow, Russia
>From kaa at msu.net Mon Apr 17 14:23:49 2006
From: kaa at msu.net (Alexander Krapivin)
Date: Mon Apr 17 11:23:59 2006
Subject: [Nav-users] Missing wlan.gif
Message-ID: 44435EA5.7070308@msu.net
Hi!
I've found that there is no file wlan.gif in nav sources.
AFAIK, it should be in /usr/local/nav/apache/webapps/qq/gfx. Please add
it to development tree.
--
With best regards,
Alexander Krapivin mailto:kaa@msu.net
NOC MSUNET ICQ UIN:3967345
MSU, Moscow, Russia
>From odd.hauge at hiMolde.no Tue Apr 18 13:01:52 2006
From: odd.hauge at hiMolde.no (Hauge Odd Arne)
Date: Tue Apr 18 12:02:43 2006
Subject: [Nav-users] Machine tracker
Message-ID: 8EEE7738AEDF6947B3E5508A0244D1C27D1B6C@stam.himolde.no
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kristian Eide [mailto:kreide@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:05 AM
> To: Hauge Odd Arne
> Cc: nav-users@itea.ntnu.no
> Subject: Re: [Nav-users] Machine tracker
>
> > Machine Tracker does not report Module/Port for machines
> connected to CatOS switches, only the switch:
> > MAC Switch
> Module Port Start time End time
> > 00127959bbf5 molde-telerom1-sw.hiMolde.no
> 2006-03-30 16:10 Still active
>
> Does the port in question show up in the switch port report?
>
Yes it does. It's the same behavior for all ports on all catos switches.
> > And Nav still reports that I have above 200 000
> switchports. Vlan defined in one location are shown in the
> report for every location, regardless if the vlans are
> active/defined or not on all switches in every location.
>
> I believe this is caused by a bug in the code which tries to
> determine the extend of private (i.e. vlans without a router)
> networks.
> Unfortunately this code was not tested well enough and it
> really should be disabled for now. I hope Morten can help
> take care of this when he returns.
>
Great.
- odd arne